🎉 The #CandyDrop Futures Challenge is live — join now to share a 6 BTC prize pool!
📢 Post your futures trading experience on Gate Square with the event hashtag — $25 × 20 rewards are waiting!
🎁 $500 in futures trial vouchers up for grabs — 20 standout posts will win!
📅 Event Period: August 1, 2025, 15:00 – August 15, 2025, 19:00 (UTC+8)
👉 Event Link: https://www.gate.com/candy-drop/detail/BTC-98
Dare to trade. Dare to win.
Web3 New Trends: Singapore vs Hong Kong, Who Will Prevail?
Web3 New Opportunities: The Competition between Singapore and Hong Kong
TOKEN2049 is being held in Singapore in full swing, attracting many Web3 practitioners from afar. In Asia, Singapore and Hong Kong stand out as two major hubs in the Web3 field, each with its own characteristics and challenges. This article will compare the performance and prospects of these two cities in the Web3 domain from multiple perspectives.
Policy Environment
Policies are a key factor in the development of Web3, involving regulations and oversight related to cryptocurrencies, blockchain, and digital identity. A friendly and stable policy environment can provide clear guidance and assurance for Web3 projects, fostering innovation and compliance.
Singapore has consistently maintained an open and forward-looking attitude, strongly supporting fintech innovation. The Monetary Authority of Singapore provides a "regulatory sandbox" for blockchain, metaverse, and Web3.0 technology enterprises, allowing innovative projects that do not fully comply with current regulations to be tested. In addition, Singapore has also enacted the Payment Services Act, issuing licenses and strengthening consumer protection.
Hong Kong is relatively cautious in terms of policy, but it has recently shown an open attitude towards innovation in virtual assets. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government issued a policy declaration on the development of virtual assets at the end of 2022, attracting numerous leading technology companies and startups. However, Hong Kong's regulation of virtual asset exchanges is relatively strict, which may affect its competitiveness in the Web3 field.
Overall, Singapore's policy environment is more liberal, while Hong Kong focuses on providing a flexible and inclusive environment for Web3 projects, while also ensuring market stability and consumer interests.
Talent Resources
Talent is the core of Web3 development, including technical developers, entrepreneurs, managers, and consultants. International talent constitutes a diverse Web3 community.
Singapore has a clear advantage in talent, thanks to its high-quality education system, multicultural background, convenient visa policies, and good quality of life. World-class institutions such as Nanyang Technological University and the National University of Singapore have cultivated a large number of technology talents. Singapore also attracts global Web3 experts and leaders, providing various types of visas to facilitate foreign talents in entrepreneurship and work.
Hong Kong, as an international city, also has a considerable number of Web3 talents, but faces some challenges. The education system in Hong Kong is relatively conservative and lacks systematic training in Web3-related technologies and knowledge. Although policies such as the Talent Admission Scheme have been introduced, there are still issues such as limited quotas and complex application processes.
Singapore has a greater advantage in talent, being able to cultivate and attract more Web3 talent, and providing a more suitable environment for innovative development. Hong Kong needs to improve its education system and talent policies to enhance its competitiveness in the Web3 field.
Cost of Living
The cost of living is an important consideration for Web3 practitioners when choosing where to live, including expenses for food, housing, transportation, and education. A lower cost of living allows practitioners to have more funds available for project development and improves their quality of life.
Singapore and Hong Kong are both economically developed cities with high living costs. According to data from the global database website Numbeo, Singapore and Hong Kong rank 5th and 16th in the world for cost of living, respectively.
In terms of housing, Hong Kong has the highest rent in the world, averaging about 23,700 yuan per month, while Singapore ranks eighth, averaging about 16,000 yuan per month.
In terms of food, prices in Singapore are slightly lower and there are more options. Hawker centers in Singapore offer meals averaging 15-25 RMB, while dai pai dongs in Hong Kong are around 25-35 RMB. Grocery prices in supermarkets are also slightly lower in Singapore compared to Hong Kong.
In other aspects such as daily necessities, clothing, and entertainment, the differences between the two places are not significant. Hong Kong has no sales tax and often has discounts, so certain products may be cheaper.
Overall, the cost of living in Singapore and Hong Kong has its pros and cons, depending on individual income levels and spending habits.
Future Development
The future development involves the potential and prospects of the Web3 field, including aspects such as technological innovation, market demand, and social impact. A good development outlook can attract more Web3 practitioners to contribute.
Singapore's advantages lie in its stable and supportive policy environment and its superior geographical location. As a neutral and open country, Singapore can establish trust with global Web3 partners, fostering cross-border and cross-chain collaboration. However, Singapore also faces challenges such as a small population size and insufficient talent resources, and it is susceptible to global economic and political factors.
Hong Kong's advantages lie in its strong financial strength and close ties with mainland China. As an international financial center, Hong Kong can provide abundant and efficient funding and services for Web3 projects. As a Special Administrative Region of China, Hong Kong can also participate in the innovative development of the Web3 field in China.
Both places have their own opportunities and challenges in future development, and the key lies in how to respond to changes in the external environment and leverage their own advantages to create value.
Conclusion
Singapore and Hong Kong each have their own characteristics in the Web3 field. Singapore has more open policies and excellent talent resources, but faces challenges in scale and competitiveness. Hong Kong has strong financial strength and a close relationship with the mainland, but is troubled by issues such as high rents and conservative education. The future development of both places depends on how they respond to changes, leverage their advantages, and seize opportunities in the wave of Web3.