In the cryptocurrency market, BTC, as the undisputed “digital gold,” has long dominated. While XRP has attracted a lot of attention in recent years with its unique position in the field of cross-border payments. Investors often ask: “Can XRP become the next BTC?” The answer to this question not only involves technical differences but is also closely related to market positioning, regulatory environment, and long-term value proposition.
The core value of Bitcoin lies in its decentralization and scarcity. As the first blockchain project, BTC is designed as a ‘store of value’ asset to combat inflation, with its fixed supply of 21 million coins, global consensus, and miner incentive mechanism, making it a safe haven choice for institutional investors.
In contrast, XRP’s positioning leans more towards financial infrastructure tools. Its underlying technology aims to improve cross-border payment efficiency, achieve fast settlement between banks through the RippleNet network, with transaction confirmation times as fast as 3-5 seconds, and costs less than $0.01. This functional difference determines the roles of the two in the ecosystem: BTC serves as an ‘anchor’ for asset allocation, while XRP acts as a ‘lubricant’ for financial liquidity.
From the market performance perspective, BTC has long accounted for over 60% of the total market value of cryptocurrencies, while XRP, although ranking in the top five, has a market value of only about 7% of BTC (as of May 8, 2025, BTC’s market value is about $1.98 trillion, and XRP is about $130 billion). This gap stems from BTC’s first-mover advantage and brand effect, while the value of XRP depends more on the progress of cooperation between Ripple and financial institutions.
Bitcoin uses the Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism, relying on global miners to maintain network security, but transaction speed and energy consumption have always been controversial. XRP, on the other hand, uses a unique Ripple protocol consensus algorithm (RPCA), which enables trusted validation nodes to quickly confirm transactions without the need for mining, resulting in extremely low energy consumption. This design makes it far more efficient than BTC, but also raises questions due to centralized governance (Ripple Labs holding a large amount of XRP).
From a technical perspective, the upgrade of BTC focuses on Layer 2 solutions (such as the Lightning Network) to improve scalability, while XRP focuses on integrating with central bank digital currencies (CBDC) and expanding smart contract functionality. For example, Ripple’s recent launch of the RLUSD stablecoin and Metaco custody service aims to enhance its penetration in traditional finance.
Bitcoin’s ‘decentralized’ nature has led to its classification as a commodity rather than a security in most regions globally, resulting in relatively less regulatory resistance. In contrast, XRP has been embroiled in a prolonged legal battle with the SEC. Although the court ruled in 2023 that XRP is not a security, Ripple still faces fines and operational restrictions. Regulatory uncertainty has directly impacted XRP’s market performance—even during the cryptocurrency bull market of 2024-2025, XRP has significantly lagged behind BTC and ETH in terms of price increase.
However, the leadership change at the SEC in 2025 (new chairman Paul Atkins supporting crypto innovation) brought a turning point for XRP. If XRP ETF is approved or Ripple cooperates with more central banks, its price may experience explosive growth. For example, Standard Chartered Bank predicts that by the end of 2025, XRP could reach $5.50, surpassing Ethereum in market value.
Current analysts’ long-term forecasts for XRP are polarized:
By contrast, the long-term forecasts for BTC are more consistent, with most institutions believing that it will surpass $500,000 before 2030, mainly due to its scarcity and safe-haven properties. The growth logic for the two is completely different: BTC relies on the macro financial environment, while XRP needs to prove its actual utility value.
Despite XRP’s technological advantage in the payment field, it faces three major challenges:
The fundamental difference between XRP and BTC determines that they are difficult to directly replace. Bitcoin’s status as ‘digital gold’ is difficult to shake, while the success or failure of XRP depends on whether it can establish an irreplaceable ecological barrier in the field of cross-border payments. In the short term, XRP may achieve a price surge due to regulatory favorable and technological breakthroughs (such as surpassing ETH’s market value of $3.70), but the probability of becoming the ‘next BTC’ in the long term is extremely low.
For investors, XRP is more suitable as a configuration option for blockchain financial applications rather than a substitute for the value storage tool of BTC. Only when Ripple completely resolves legal disputes and achieves widespread institutional adoption, can XRP create an independent chapter in the history of cryptocurrencies.