Discussion on the Complexity of Bitcoin Network Fees and the Importance of Full Nodes

robot
Abstract generation in progress

The Importance of Bitcoin Network Fees and Running a Full Node

In a discussion involving two Bitcoin researchers, they emphasized the complexity of Bitcoin network fees and the challenges of managing transactions and block sizes.

Technical Director Jeffrey emphasized that using the term "Gas fee" to describe Bitcoin transaction fees is inaccurate, as Bitcoin's fees are based on transaction size, rather than being based on computational workload like Ethereum.

Researcher A Jian pointed out that the congestion and high network fees caused by BRC20 tokens on the Bitcoin network not only affect user experience but also lead to a significant increase in the UTXO set, which may bring uncertainty to the future development of the Bitcoin network.

Both researchers emphasized the importance of running a Full Node. Although running a Full Node may not have direct economic benefits, it plays a key role in maintaining network integrity, resisting censorship, and ensuring trustless verification of the blockchain. This is crucial for protecting individual financial privacy and the ability to trade freely.

They also discussed the differences between soft forks and hard forks in the Bitcoin network, as well as the role of miner voting in network upgrades. Examples like BIP 148 and the Segregated Witness upgrade illustrate the proactive role that Full Node operators can play in contentious upgrades.

Finally, the discussion reaffirmed the philosophical essence of Bitcoin. Unlike other cryptocurrencies that may cater to the concept of power, Bitcoin is designed to limit power in order to protect individual freedom, making its position in the cryptocurrency space more unique.

Decoding the Gatekeeper's Dilemma: Developers and the Bitcoin "Ecosystem" (Part 2)

BTC1.33%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoHistoryClassvip
· 07-25 10:44
*checks charts* classic network congestion pattern... just like mt.gox in 2013
Reply0
DaoGovernanceOfficervip
· 07-25 10:44
ugh the level of misinformation here... empirically speaking full nodes are WAY more crucial than tx fees for protocol health
Reply0
pumpamentalistvip
· 07-25 10:41
To be honest, BRC20 is a trap.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrowniesvip
· 07-25 10:36
Node Freemen Romanticists
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearchervip
· 07-25 10:29
The gas fee has skyrocketed...
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 07-25 10:23
The rise and fall of the waves are all empty; who has seen the true face of Mount Lu?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)