Previously, the first wave used the lines I drew myself.

Using 50u on the eighth day yielded over 600% returns. Although a brutal aesthetic strategy was employed, there was an attempt to precisely lock in a range. The pinbar combined with previous trading experience, but it seems that the leverage wasn’t that super high. Compared to the extreme leverage of a hundred times, which rolls over, he exploded a thousand times over several years just to achieve a performance of over a hundred times. The survival rate is extremely low and the consumption is too great.

Observe the actual market trends in the past few days. If using 104000 as the moving average, I have reserved over 5500 for forced liquidation, and generally it is around 6000-8000. The forced liquidation has already been set quite high for myself.

Sometimes I think about the extreme market conditions (for example, when Ethereum drops from 3500 to 1390) when opening a 3-5x position, whether you will get liquidated or not. Even with 2x leverage, you can't escape. I feel that this leverage issue needs to be explored in depth. Many low-leverage players open 2x positions, and even if they get the direction right ten times, they might just break even. If there's one extreme market condition among those ten times, a drawdown is inevitable. Each time you make a bit on Gate, losing once brings you back to zero. This way of playing feels a bit off.
You said that with ultra-high leverage, dozens or even hundreds of times, the outcome will be even worse, and in the long run, it will lead to anxiety or end up at zero.
I think leverage should be used flexibly. When you are sure of the direction and have confidence, that's when you should make money, pulling it to 5-20 times (during the initial phase of small capital operations).
If the funds are large, it is necessary to reduce the requirements and leverage compared to the former. The former makes 100 from 1,000, while the latter makes 10,000 from 100,000. The reasoning is understood, and there is really no need for high risk.

Personally, I feel that low risk does not mean that with lower leverage, the risk is lower. Whether you open a long position at 1.5 times leverage at 3500 or at 10 times leverage at 3500, the outcome will be the same; you will get liquidated regardless. The problem is that if the price goes up by one or two points, with 1.5 times leverage, you won't earn much. It takes a long time and is not flexible. With 10 times leverage, if the price goes up by one or two points, you can exit, look for the next entry point, which is relatively more flexible.

The so-called low-risk information is too much, I think what really reflects it is in
The first low-frequency trading reduces the probability of errors,

Second accuracy, key to entering,

Thirdly, in an accurate market, profits can roll over by one or two times. (How to put it, in contracts, this naturally involves leverage. In a single market wave, you can only capture about 10-30% and then run. To double or triple your profits, you need to get ten market movements right. I think a better method is to focus on how to achieve high-frequency arbitrage through solid techniques in the right market movement, aiming for a direct return of 200-300% or more, which is more crucial.)
Because you need to make the right call ten times to accumulate a 200-300% return, while others only need to make one correct call to achieve a 200-300% return. What if there’s a black swan event in those ten times? So there are different opinions on this matter.

Anyway, everyone has different ways of playing, different amounts of capital, and different periods.

Can 50u and 500,000u be compared?
50u makes 100% only 50u,
If you give me 500,000 u, I will definitely not do 100% in a month, just doing 1% will still make me 5,000 u.

This 50u is purely for testing, I have no need to exhaust energy for a 1% return, because no one really lacks this 50u. Just treat it as a game, follow the strategy and see if it can make 54 times in a month or go to zero. Anyway, I've already completed almost half of it, and with a playful mindset, miracles can happen.