In an ever evolving world of blockchains and dApps, cross-chain composability has become more promising and even necessary for a multi-chain eco.

Most projects claim to solve it, few even understand it, but in practice, most solutions fall short.

What does true composability across chains actually look like?

To answer that, we need to look at what @anoma is building:

Today, dApps are partitioned. Each chain is its own world, with its own rules, assets, and logic. Even the most basic interactions across chains like swapping ETH for SOL often require bridges, wrappers, complex wallets, and centralized relayers.

That’s today’s reality…..

Most dApps and protocols are isolated within their native chains. Bridging them is slow, insecure, and often breaks user experience.

Anoma is building the foundation for true composability with a totally different architecture: a chain-agnostic, intent centric OS for Web3 that allows:

➔ 𝗨𝘀𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 → 𝗢𝘂𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀, 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻

Instead of hardcoding interactions (e.g., "send from Ethereum to Solana using Bridge X"), users simply express what they want to do and Anoma handles the rest.

For instance; A user says, “Swap my $ETH for $SOL at the best rate.”

Anoma interprets this intent, finds matching counterparties or solvers, and executes across chains - no manual bridging, no multi-step interfaces.

➔ 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗯𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀

In traditional Web3, dApps are mostly confined to the chain they’re built on. Anoma abstracts this entirely. Developers build against intents and outcomes, not chains.

So an NFT marketplace on Cosmos can interact with a DeFi protocol on Ethereum or a ZK rollup without complex glue code.

➔ 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀

Anoma uses zero-knowledge proofs and multi-party computation, allowing privacy-preserving interactions that compose with both transparent and private systems.

That means applications can compose private and public states across chains. A level of composability not possible in most existing ecosystems.

So, when we ask; "What does true cross-chain composability look like?" the clear answer is @anoma.