Several banks in the country are suspected of leaking customer data, with nearly one million account information being sold on the dark web.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Recently, there have been reports that customer data from multiple domestic banks is being sold on the dark web. According to reports, the leaked data is divided into two main categories:

The first category consists of about 900,000 account information records from a large agricultural bank, priced at $3,999. This data involves sensitive financial information about customers, including their names, addresses, contact details, ID card numbers, as well as deposit amounts and the services they have used.

The second category of data is broader, including 800,000 customer records from a certain Shanghai bank, 460,000 credit card information from a certain Industrial Bank, 200,000 high-end customer data from Shanghai Wealth Management, and 100,000 customer information from a certain Pudong Development Bank. In addition, there are detailed information about 12 million Chinese startup companies, personal data of 200,000 Chinese corporate executives, and 1.2 million data of Chinese VPN users. Among them, the startup company information covers content such as company name, legal representative, registered address, and business scope.

Industry experts analyze that bank data breaches typically occur through two channels: first, technical personnel illegally exporting data from the backend database; second, business personnel obtaining data from the frontend system. From a technical perspective, database breaches may be caused by internal personnel illegally copying data or external hackers intruding. This incident is likely due to insufficient security measures leading to the database breach.

This incident has once again raised concerns about the data security of financial institutions. Banks, as organizations that hold a large amount of sensitive personal information, should adopt stricter security measures, enhance internal management, and improve technological defenses to ensure the safety of customer information. At the same time, relevant regulatory authorities need to strengthen their oversight of data protection efforts by financial institutions, establish more stringent data security standards, and prevent similar incidents from occurring again.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaservip
· 21h ago
Banks are unreliable, let's transfer the money to coins.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatchervip
· 21h ago
Garbage banks are too unreliable.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryvip
· 21h ago
It's outrageous, why is it Agricultural Bank again?
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChainvip
· 21h ago
Selling on the dark web still...dangerous
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidatedvip
· 21h ago
Will no longer believe in centralization, right?
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignStevevip
· 21h ago
Let's wait and see, is there bank insurance that can cover this?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)